Last night, Guangzhou Evergrande and Jiangsu Suning fought, and the referee's decision caused great controversy. As mentioned before, there are several major problems with referees' enforcement of this season: First, the penalty standards are not uniform, including two situations: 1. Under similar circumstances, different referees have different penalty standards, 2. The same game, the same Referees have inconsistent enforcement standards; secondly, they rely too much on VAR, which makes the game fragmented and intermittent. This is mainly because the referee is not confident in his level of punishment. Now add one more thing: poor control over the game scene. This season, players "siege" the referee many times, and even the players of the two teams "siege" together, and the referees have difficulty in controlling the situation, resulting in a situation close to out of control. If the coaches from both sides hadn't rushed into the field last night, there might have been even greater conflicts. It's like a strong team. If you hire an unknown and limited coach, how can you keep the big names in the team? The same goes for law enforcement. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that the key games of the second stage be appropriately invited to high-level European referees to enforce the law.
昨晚，广州恒大和江苏苏宁打了起来，裁判的决定引起了很大的争议。 如前所述，本赛季裁判的执法存在几个主要问题：首先，处罚标准不统一，包括以下两种情况：1.在相似的情况下，不同的裁判具有不同的处罚标准； 2.比赛相同，同一裁判员的执行标准不一致；其次，他们过分依赖VAR，这使得游戏变得支离破碎且断断续续。这主要是因为裁判对自己的处罚水平没有信心。 现在再添加一件事：对游戏场景的控制不力。这个赛季，球员多次“围攻”裁判，甚至两支球队的球员一起“围攻”，裁判很难控制局面，导致局面几乎失控。如果昨晚双方的教练都没有赶到现场，那么可能会有更大的冲突。 就像一支强大的团队。如果您聘用了一位名不见经传的有限教练，您如何才能保持团队中的知名度？执法部门也是如此。 因此，强烈建议将第二阶段的关键比赛适当地邀请给欧洲高级裁判员以执行法律。